

The Logitech C925e (left) has a significantly wider design than the C930e (right). When it comes to design, the Logitech C925e is the bulkier and heavier one but it has a more modern look than the C930e. Logitech C925e vs C930e Comparison Chart Model

SVC is especially good for live streaming if your end point also supports it. The C930E C925E and the Pro Webcam support hardware H.264 SVC (Scalable Video Coding) encoding (which is different than H.264 AVC (Advanced Video Coding)). It’s sensor can record at max 4096 x 2160 (DCI native) and 3840 x 2160 (UHD). Thus it uses all the 5Gbps bandwidth of USB 3.0 (equivalent to USB 3.1 Gen 1) to stream MJPEG (equivalent to USB 3.1 Gen 1) video which has to be decoded and reencoded by whatever video calling/streaming/recording solution you use. The 4k Pro / Brio is the only high end Logitech webcam that doesn’t include hardware H.264 AVC video encoding. Consumers get the 4k PRO with a nice looking packaging to attract buyers in stores while businesses get the Brio in a simple box. Logitech has 2 names (and 2 part numbers) for the same webcam. I am not sure it it’s the wider space between the 2 mics, the different grille, different hardware or all 3. The difference can be easily heard in YouTube comparisons. The sound quality coming from the C920-C and C925E (wide form factor) is superior to that from the C920 C930E and C922 (classic C920 body). We have a C-925E in the office and, out of the box, we were able to record in OBS, XSplit and in Chrome when recording through WebRTC. Logitech has 3 webcams advertised as being capable of 60fps:īut the C-925E also supports 60fps. The newer C920 seem to have dropped their Carl Zeiss certification as noticed by C920 which bears the Carl Zeiss certification on the webcam. It took Logitech more than 4 years after releasing the initial C920 to release a new consumer webcam, the C922 Pro Stream To clear up some the confusion I’ve made a comparison table:īackground replacement, infrared sensor+LED for Windows Hello
